Primary Resource Essay on Aristotle, Politics and Plato, the Republic

Primary Resource Essay on Aristotle, Politics and Plato, the Republic

Student’s Name
Course Name
Completion Date

The political society is an important base of codependence necessary to achieve “good life” and happiness. It is explained that the village is the primary basis of a state and is composed of equally important aspects that have a significant role. Such significance includes the man as the leader and the woman as the healer given by Plato in The Republic. As man has been described to be dependent on the state in Aristotle’s Politics, the political relevance of classes within a state or a society, as Plato says in The Republic, gives the essence of man’s dependence in it to achieve happiness.
Man cannot be dependent on one’s self because every part of society has an equally important role to play in order for it as a whole to achieve happiness. The first section of Aristotle’s Politics describes the union that exists between man and other aspects of a society that has to be preserved for each has its importance: “…there must be a union of those who cannot exist without each other…that both may be preserved.” In this elaboration, Aristotle intends on explaining the codependence of certain parties in the society, for instance, “men and women,” and “master and slave” in achieving the happy ending of the society. Furthermore, Aristotle suggests that a “state” is an integral part of the human life with regards to achieving “good life” because it is the end of the basic unit of a village, and that “the end of a thing is the best…” The thought given by Aristotle here represents the essential dependence of man to his state, with the priori that “a man…without a state is either a bad man or above humanity…” It represents the relationship between the state and its people here that links Aristotle’s work to Plato’s. Plato uses the states to elaborate on what justice is when perceived from the political perspective. In the “imaginary city that Plato uses to explain his narrative, there are three codependent aspects of society; the ruler, the guardian and the producers This alone presents the evidence of a codependence nature of the society of men, to achieve happiness. In light of this fact, the political power and influence must resonate within the subjects’ interests and not the rulers to make justice suffice among all the subjects.
The political sphere of society is governed by justice, trust, and inclusion, as is my synthetic priori to analyze its importance in governing a society. Plato defines a political society as one governed by codependent aspects such as the ruler, the guardian, and the producer. This aspect represents the codependence nature of man and his subjects in achieving happiness. As such, in Aristotle’s view, society is divided into different classes, as likewise seen in Plato, “one class is very rich, another very poor, and a third in a mean.” As is the view of Plato, the guardian is the moderator and hero of the state. Further, Glaucon uses the analogy of a dog and its family to emphasize the importance of the division of power in the society, for it is the ultimate political understanding in a society: “the only difference between them is that the males are stronger and the females weaker.” This analogy represents the different capabilities of various aspects of the society; in this case, the male and female and their reliance upon each other. The man has been described as a leader of the family and the woman as the healer. With such a perspective, the political sphere has been applauded as one with different sections exercising different strengths as it is mandatory to be governed by reason among such diversified powers. With the guardian in the case of Plato being given the ability to protect the people from unjust actions, Aristotle can somewhat be seen as having the median class as the states’ guardians. This sanction stems from the fact that this class is not unstable when it comes to political power, unlike the low and high classes: “…the middle class is least likely to shrink from rule, or to be over-ambitious for it…” For this reason, the middle class can be considered the guardians of the state.
In conclusion, man is dependent on the state as a source of completion as he has been described as a “political animal.” With this regard, the importance of states has been delineated as one that serves to create a just environment for its people by way of further establishing political society. A leader governs this society, its people protected by a guardian and fed by the producers. The contributions of both Aristotle and Plato in Politics and The Republic gives the significance of political influence and the benefits it can accrue to its people. As such, the state is given as the ending of a village, which is the most primary political state. As has been described, the ending of something is better than its beginning, therefore offering happiness in its final state; therefore, a state offers happiness to its people.

Bibliography
Aristotle, Jowett, B., & Davis, H. W. (1920). Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.
Plato & Bloom, A. (1968). The Republic. New York: New York Basic Books.

Smart Home as a Service

Smart Home as a Service
Institution
Name

Smart Home as a Service
Smart Home as a service is a collection of specialized services that perform input from the smart home sensors. It learns the family’s living pattern and how they use the home, making intelligent decisions to make the homes; more safe, comfortable, and energy-efficient (Park et al., 2018). A Smart Homes as a Service (SHaaS) system includes multiple services that use input from the home sensors.
The SHaaS technology makes use of smart devices which has use intelligence with decision-making capabilities. Smart devices’ network on the system and application analyzes the incoming data and decides to control and activate other devices without the need for human intervention. A network of sensors is employed to measure and monitors the home environment constantly (Kim, Park, & Choi, 2017). The smart sensors collect information about who is at home, where they are at home, and what normal activity they are doing at home on a particular day and time.
The SHaaS service track certain events and behavior patterns in the home and recognizes what is going on in the home. The SHaaS uses intelligence and information learned by the system about residents. It makes decisions about whether to turn on or off the heater, the air conditioner, the lights, its checks whether to lock doors and windows and activate the home’s security system (Park et al., 2018). The system should automatically sense when the family member is streaming a movie on a hot summer night. It should turn off the lights and turn down the air conditioner in the empty parts of the home. The system should identify power-consuming devices that are not in use, such as gaming console and computer, and turn them off using sensors.
SHaaS system reduces wastage of resources from water to power energy by monitoring consumption. The system reduced energy consumption by anticipating the fall of outside temperature during the night. It saves water by monitoring the water supply system for leak and flow issues (Park et al., 2018). The network of devices learns how they live in the home and makes predictions about family behaviors. It gains knowledge of the number of household members, how the rooms are used, and when used. It understands when the members who are working from home and who gets up early. The behavior patterns are absorbed by the SHaaS system and exploited to enhance the convenience and comfort of the home environment (Apthorpe, Reisman, & Feamster, 2017). The home environment is set to be cost-saving and potentially reduce energy consumption.
There are four basic components of the SHaaS system that are meant to work together. These include a network of sensors, a local hub, a central management app. At the same time, the service provider handles subscriptions and software upgrades (Park et al., 2018). The network of sensors in the home works by providing a general indication of the home’s movement, when and where they occur. The sensors also check whether the home is secure and how the prevailing environmental conditions and other issues are collected. The sensors collect information wirelessly connected to the local hub, a gateway that performs the task of securely transmitting to an intelligent cloud service (Hong, Nam, & Kim, 2020). The intelligent cloud service collects the input and analyzes it; whenever changes are detected, the family members are notified by sending alerts.
The central management app allows the consumer, including family members, to manage the network of sensors and cloud service through their smartphones and other web-connected devices in a single user interface. The SHaaS service providers can handle customer support and deal with the service and software upgrades and install any changes to the system. The service provider performs the billing and management of the subscription of the SHaaS service.
The form of network connectivity is mostly wireless for smart home devices within the house. Network connectivity involves wireless connectivity options such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and ZigBee. Wi-Fi offers high bandwidth wireless connectivity for music and video streaming (Park et al., 2018). Bluetooth is a great wireless option that is efficient and low-cost and handles communications for all kinds of low data rate applications varying from wearables, device input, and output. ZigBee is developing wireless options that handle connections of low data rate battery-operated networking applications such as security systems, home sensor networks, and environmental controls.
Vivint Smart Home is a company that delivers smart home products and services that enable the management and protection of their homes and families (Hong, Nam, & Kim, 2020). Vivint Smart Home deals with equipment-financing plans that initially promote the purchase of their equipment and operate a proprietary cloud-based AI platform that operates in processing over 500 million events daily (Hong, Nam, & Kim, 2020). The data on events feeds on the AI engine to assist in learning how the customer can be supported in the management of their homes.
Comfort system is a product of Cytech Technology, including an integration of intruder alarm, home automation controller, voicemail, and intercom, which come in one package. A design and installed Comfort system improves the home by smart home features such as fully automated home cinema room, multi-room music system, audio, video distribution, surveillance monitoring, light control, and access control. The service provider states that the design principles of discrete and manageable technology result in a dramatic and dramatic living space and allows useable control features and an extensive home entertainment system (Hong, Nam, & Kim, 2020). The company highlights that the success of Smart Homes as a Service system is good design and installation using efficient products with a known track record in working together in the creation of a smart home.
According to Apthorpe, Reisman, and Feamster (2017), besides all the success, problems that face Smart Homes as a Service system include privacy exploitation, the high cost of installation and use, and the high dependency on the internet. A smart device recorded a private conversation from a recent incident and sent it to one of the individuals’ employees without the owner’s permission. Privacy issues pose frustrating problems and will raise acceptability debate if not solved and efforts directed towards securing the consumers (Apthorpe, Reisman, & Feamster, 2017). There is also the issue of the system’s complexity that increases dependencies on the professionals where only service providers can handle the specific Smart Homes as a Service system.
In conclusion, Smart Homes, as a Service technology, improves homes by offering 24/7 service of monitoring, tracking, and controlling events inside and outside the home, which is a superb experience. Although some homes might have pre-installed smart technology, whether pre-installed or post-installed, people must consider the safety and privacy before giving total control of their homes to smart devices and applications.

References
Apthorpe, N., Reisman, D., & Feamster, N. (2017). Closing the blinds: Four strategies for protecting smart home privacy from network observers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06809.
Hong, A., Nam, C., & Kim, S. (2020). What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services?. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101867.
Kim, Y., Park, Y., & Choi, J. (2017). A study on the adoption of IoT smart home service: using Value-based Adoption Model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(9-10), 1149-1165.
Park, E., Kim, S., Kim, Y., & Kwon, S. J. (2018). Smart home services as the next mainstream of the ICT industry: determinants of the adoption of smart home services. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17(1), 175-190.

Criminalizing conduct that a defendant does not understand or cannot control

There is no purpose to be served by criminalizing conduct that a defendant does not understand or cannot control.
The attempt of criminalizing conduct that the defendant has no understanding and is unable to control does not meet the criminal justice aspect of justice, equality and fairness to the parties involved as in the cases of insanity and automatism or murder of diminished responsibility and loss of control. In this regard, the defendant is controlled by external forces that they have no control over to commit a crime; thus, it will be only fair to address the external factors instead of convicting the defendant. The field of criminal justice has experienced mixed reactions and opinions on handling defendants that have been involved in committing crimes out of their own free will in the interest of serving justice, equality and fairness to the defendant and the victims in the crimes (Ormerod, 2015). It is vital to note that circumstances and conditions experienced by the defendants incline them to engage in crime, and thus convicting them without considering their condition will not serve the aspects of justice, fairness and equality to the parties is interested in such cases. Consequently, the law needs to be sufficiently developed and equipped to ensure that it can effectively handle the cases where the defendant engages in crime due to insanity, automatisms and conditions beyond their control. In this regard, the defendant is handled most appropriately to ensure they are offered the relevant help to ensure that they do not engage in such crimes or any other crime in the future due to their nature and external forces. In such cases, persons involved in crime due to insanity or external forces should be judged or handled differently from normal people engaged in crime out of their free will. The process of criminalizing the conduct of a defendant should be based on the defendant’s condition (insanity and automatism) and circumstances (diminished responsibility and loss of control)to determine their guilt in the interest of serving justice, equality and fairness to all the parties involved.
The legal position of defendants unable to understand or control their criminal conduct
The legal position on handling insanity driven crimes have consistently changed as indicated through the defense approaches and tactics adopted and accepted in the courts of law. In this regard, the English law enables a suspect of a crime not convicted on very restricted occasions because they were insane at the time of the crime (Peay, 2012). The criminal lawyers pull an insanity defense to exonerate their clients from the criminal accusations. On the other hand, the automatism aspect is raised when the victim was in total lack of control for their action at the time of the alleged offense.
First, the law as provisions regulating the unfitness to take a plea to prevent suspects being put on trial from trial since they are thought to be incapable of participating appropriately in the legal proceedings. The criminal justice system deems it unfair to try a suspect who cannot defend themselves due to legally defend themselves (Peay, 2012). When the judge decides that the defendant is not fit to stand trial, the trial stops, and fact-finding heating occurs instead. When the hearing ends, and the judge decided that the suspect got involved in crime due to insanity, they are not convicted and thus cannot be sentenced.
The unfitness to take plea entails the mental state of the accused at the time of trial. At the same time, the defenses on the automatism and insanity concentrate on the accused’s mental state when they committed the offense. The suspect of a crime might have a mental disorder that influenced them when they were involved in crime, and the same mental disorder must be affecting when the case is taken to court (Dejchai, 2019). The aspect of unfitness and insanity overlap, but they involve various questions on the accused person’s mental capacity to handle the criminal justice process’s different stages. The insanity and automatism aspects are defined and ascertained from the field of psychology, psychiatry and medicine.
The insanity defense is provided under the “M’Naghten Rules,” as presented by the House of Lords in 1843, to establish a defense on insanity. The insanity defense goes through when it is proved that at the time of the act the accused was acting under the influence of disease of the mind, and does not know what they were doing was in contravention of set laws and rules (Dejchai, 2019). When the defendant effectively balances the probability that they lie within the insanity test, then the Crown Court will argue that they are not guilty because of insanity, also referred to as “special verdict.”
On the defense of automatism, it comes to play when the accused person lacked control of their actions and body when they were involved in committing a crime (Dejchai, 2019). The defense of automatism is available to all forms of crimes. In automatism, the accused need to present enough evidence to ensure that automatism becomes an issue of dispute between the prosecution and defense.
Deficiencies law handling defendants unable to understand or control their criminal conduct
The law has technicalities and weaknesses in addressing the defendant’s issue involved in crime as a result of automatism and insanity, thus requiring effective reform to streamline the operation of the law. In this regard, there are legal technicalities that affect the application of the unfitness to plead aspect. There is the question of whether a person is unfit to take a plea and stand trial will come when the accused is entering a plea to take charge of guilty or not, if not before (Rix, 2016). In order to be fit to take a plea and stand trial, the suspect must be capable of doing certain things such as instructing a lawyer to handle their case or follow trial proceedings. However, the challenge arises in that the legal test adopted in evaluating the accused’s fitness does not cover all the right abilities. The legal test sets the fitness threshold too high. The law does not prescribe the procedure nor the process to be adopted to evaluate and assess the accused’s fitness to stand trial. In this case, the current law’s effect is to limit the number of people found unfit to take a plea, meaning that many people are tried when their state of mind is not fit for standing trial or taking a plea. Therefore, there is a need to adopt reforms by setting parameters and processes to be adopted to test a person’s fitness to take a plea or stand trial. This approach would ensure an increase in the number of persons with grave mental disorders found not fit to stand trial and a decreasing number of people relying on reformed insanity defense for their crimes.
The law presents difficulties in defining the real meaning of “disease of the mind” regarding if it’s a disease or a disorder and that the word mind is not interpreted to mean the brain, thus confusing in determining the insanity defense. The M’Naghten test argues that the accused must be suffering from a defect of reason from the mind’s disease. The judges expound the phrase further to interpret the mind’s disease to be an impairment of mental functioning resulting from medical conditioning (Rix, 2016). In this case, the disorder is necessarily not a disease, and the word mind is not interpreted to mean the brain. The law has not limited the idea of disease of the mind to mental disorders; instead, the law has classified the lack of control caused by either the internal or external factors. The involuntary conduct caused by the internal factors is regarded as insanity and leads to a special verdict. On the other hand, involuntary conduct arising from external factors is regarded as automatism, and they amount to a simple acquittal. In this case, the law drawing a line between insanity and automatism introduces an anomaly since there is difficult to differentiate between internal (insanity) and external (automatism). There is confusion in applying the law, and thus the reform, in this case, should classify conditions that will be termed as either insanity or automatism to make it easy for judges to make decisions.
The M’Naghten law is in contradiction with the medical understanding. For instance, the terms “disease of the mind” and insanity are not legal terms but outdated legal; terms. Moreover, the term insanity is stigmatizing and inaccurate in reference to the defendant, thus putting off many people who would successfully win their cases through the insanity defense (Farrell, 2016). The “M’Naghten Rules” need to be interpreted with the help of medical practitioners or professionals to determine the severity of the defendant condition at the time they committed the offense and they type of condition they suffered to ensure that the law is effectively applied in the interest of common good for the defendant and the victims. On the other hand, the law needs to use socially acceptable and politically correct terms in reference to insanity and automatism to eliminate the stigma associated with insanity among the people. This approaches that the people will argue their cases on the doctrines of “M’Naghten Rules” to effectively defend their case.
Analysis, evaluation and application of legal theory
The insanity and automatism legal theories form the defense foundation in cases where the defendant committed crimes due to different internal and external factors. The application of the legal theory, in this case, can be evaluated from the evaluation of different case laws argued and decided using the “M’Naghten Rules.” It is vital to note that the disease of mind determination is more of a legal question as opposed to being a medical condition (Mackay, 2020). The legal question means that the insanity and automatism defenses are made based on the ordinary rules’ interpretation. In this case, any disease or condition that affects the body’s normal functioning and the mind is referred to as a disease of the mind; it does not have to be necessarily the disease affecting the brain. This approach makes the term disease of the mind to cover a wide range of conditions.
Numerous court cases can be evaluated and accessed to show the application of the insanity and automatism defenses. In this case, in the case of R v Burgess in 1991, Burgess attacked his friend Katrina while he was sleepwalking (statute). Burgess hit Katrina with a bottle and then picked up the video recorder and hit her head (Federman, 2013). In this case, the Crown Court argued that Burgess was innocent for the assault accusation because of insanity. The court ordered that Burges be detained in a psychiatrist hospital. The judge argued that sleeping was normal, but sleepwalking and causing violence while it was not normal. Therefore, Burgess causes a crime due to internal factors without his knowledge, and he was out of control of his actions; thus, the court found her not guilty but recommended psychiatric care to prevent such occurrences from occurring in the future. Additionally, under the British House of Lord, the case of R v Sullivan shows the application of the M’Naghten rule. In this case, Sullivan, the defendant, had an epileptic patient since his childhood was involved in hitting his friend during an epileptic seizure episode (Bird New, 2009). Upon recovery, the defendant could only recall that he was standing at a window with the victim lying on the floor with head injuries. The defendant was charged with assault, where the judge ruled in favor of the defendant, citing the incident occurred due to a disease of mind suffered from a post-epileptic seizure. Therefore, in both cases, the judge ruled in favor of the defendant by evaluating the causes of the purported violation of laws, thus establishing the violation due to the internal factors beyond the control of the defendants since they were related to the disease of the mind.
Logical and coherent argument handling cases where defendants unable to understand or control their criminal conduct
The M’Naghten rules provide insanity as criminal defense, but the success of the defendant is dependent on their ability and capability to prove the different aspects of the rule that include disease of the mind, defect of reason and the unawareness that their acts were wrong (Berman, 2016). The M’Naghten rules are driven towards ensuring that persons who find themselves in violation of different laws and rules due to their internal conditions or circumstances out of their control are protected from being found guilty. Thus, they are prescribed as not guilty despite their involvement in a crime.
The disease of mind entails the differences existing between being legal and medically insane. The court decision on insanity is made under the law and its interpretation, evidence and procedure (Mackay, 2020). In this case, any disease or condition that negatively affects the mind’s function is considered in cases as a contributing factor to one engaging in a crime. In the case of R v Hennessy, the defendant was accused of taking a vehicle without the owner’s consent. The defendant suffered from diabetes and had not taken insulin for three days, affecting his state of mind. The judge ruled that the condition disrupted the defendant’s mind; thus, he was sane and found not guilty.
The defect of reason element means that the defendant’s disease of mind must cause the defect of reason such that they cannot tell what they are doing in terms of nature and quality. In this case, the defendant loses their power of reasoning objectively, thus leading them to violate the law.
Lastly, the defendant or the accused must lack the knowledge that their acts are legally wrong. The fact that the defendants are unaware that their acts contradict the law makes them violate unknowingly (Loughnan and Ward, 2014). For instance, the case of T v Windle of 1952 was defense based on insanity was dismissed, for he knew his actions were wrong. The defendant suffered from mental illness but knowingly gave his wife a fatal dose of aspirin. The insanity defense was not accepted since there was no evidence and that the defendant knew that what he was doing was wrong.
Conclusion
The act of not criminalizing the conduct of defendants that cannot control or understand their acts of violating the law is addressed under the M’Naghten rules to ensure that such persons are protected from the law. In this regard, their defense is founded on insanity and automatism since it would be legally wrong to convict such individuals. Instead, the court finds alternative measures of handling them, such as recommending them to mental hospitals or psychiatric care. Additionally, the burden of proving insanity is left to the defendant where their case is dismissed when they prove the defense of insanity by showing a disease of the mind, defect of reason, and lack of knowledge of their acts’ illegality.
References
Books
Journals
Statute

The complexity of Information Systems Research in the Digital World

The complexity of Information Systems Research in the Digital World
Introduction
Complexity is an increasing emerging aspect of the digital world. Some of the emerging technologies developments that exhibit complexity include robotic process automation, algorithm decision-making, Internet of things global digital infrastructure, and other digitally enable networks. These technological phenomenon fuel complexity in the digital world by enhancing hyper connections and mutual dependencies among organizations and processes. However, wicked problems that are caused by digitalization. It worth noting that complexity organizations and individuals in all dimensions. In the digital world, complexity new challenges and opportunities for information system research. This paper seeks to analyze an article focused on the complexity of IS in the digital world. It will define diverse emerging technology as a note in the article. The paper will also determine the impact of the emerging technologies on organizations and the steps that organizations can undertake to reduce the digitalization burden. The article’s name being analyzed is “Complexity and Information Systems Research in the Emerging Digital World.”

Emerging Technologies Noted in the article and how they are impacting organizations
Digital transformation is one of the emerging trends in business organizations. There are notable new technologies explored in the article, which are influencing organizations in diverse ways. One of the emerging exhibited in this article is the existence of microprocessors. Large and small devices are currently sufficiently powered by microprocessors and connected by the internet, almost all organizations. Most of these devices integrated with artificial intelligence (IA) engines, and they can act and operate on their own. IA is an emerging technology that allows for the simulation of intelligence processes of humans. It is a combined attribute of science and computer that allows information systems intelligent and human functions, make decisions, and solve problems. For instance, the article notes that organizations are using autonomous vehicles, which can interact and understand traffic signals amid vehicles driven by human beings. Generally, Artificial Intelligence applications that apply machine learning can take data and convert into actionable. However, the application is complex and expensive because it is expensive to process large amounts of data required by IA programing.
Moreover, social networks enable individuals in organizations to become an internet content creator. Generated content can be mashed with other prevailing content and shared among other users. Other digital platforms like Airbnb and Uber enables millions to connect worldwide. Another emerging technology is cloud computing technology, which entails computing services, such as databases, servers. Software, networking, among others over the internet. This technology has fostered faster innovation and economies of scale through various algorithms. Such examples elaborate some of the critical emerging technologies used by organizations in the current century, provided in the article. These technologies have enhanced social, technical systems that are critically changing the way organizations operate.
However, Change in technology is a dynamic process that causes dynamic complexity. These complexities regarding the emerging technologies impose critical challenges for both small scale and large scale organizations. This is because there is a need for enterprises to adapt to changing technologies while maintaining internal alignment constantly. Therefore organizations can use Enterprise architecture to reduce the burden of digitalization. This method helps cope with challenges associated complexity of technologies. It also enhances the management of information system and ensuring they are in line with business elements found in complex organizations.
Conclusion
In conclusion, digital transformation presents both opportunities and challenges in organizations in various industries. Organizations face diverse challenges in managing the associated complexity. Therefore, Enterprise Architecture is leveraged to align the transformation with business elements and help manage the complexity. It helps organizations transform and manage their architecture.

Similar Sites Like Similar Websites Search

Similar Websites Search | Similar Sites Like Similar Websites Search | Similar Sites Like
Home
Top Websites
Most Visited Websites
Latest
Add Site
example.com

Similar sites like 123homework.com
123homework.com
123homework.com

get professional help with homework online | 123homework
our online homework service will help with homework quickly and efficiently. our professional writers help with your ‘help me with my homework’ request.

find similar sites
Facebook
Twitter
Email
Pinterest
Reddit
Share

Sites similar to 123homework.com – Top 76 123homework.com alternatives
tophomeworkhelper.com tophomeworkhelper.com
homework help online | best homework helper for primary school
top homework helper – great place to find best homework help online for all subjects. getting primary homework help is now easier for every student at affordable price.

Semrush Rank: 303,847 Facebook ♡: 150 Website Worth: $ 1,500
Is it similar? Yes No

nursingassignment.com nursingassignment.com

our website is no. 1 in nursing essay writing and nursing *ssignment help. feel free to hire us for nursing homework help and *ssistance

Semrush Rank: 10,502,777 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

domyhomework.services domyhomework.services
do my homework for me – let experts do your *ssignment for money
do my homework for me – let experts do your *ssignment for money

Semrush Rank: 43,873,342 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
myhomeworkdone.com myhomeworkdone.com

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 2,300
Is it similar? Yes No
learnok.com learnok.com
university and college homework help and answers to questions | learnok.com
learnok is a community of students and experts who *ssist each other. find homework help and answers easily with both colleagues and professionals looking at your questions.

Semrush Rank: 2,481,929 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

homework-desk.com homework-desk.com
homework help online | easy homework with homework-desk.com
homework help online | easy homework with homework-desk.com

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 600
Is it similar? Yes No
5homework.com 5homework.com
pay for homework | pay someone to do homework | 5homework.com
looking for homework writing service for pay someone to do your homework? just pay for homework on 5homewok.com and get a quick and quality result! try it!

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 600
Is it similar? Yes No

assignmenthelp.us assignmenthelp.us
assignment help online | *ssignment help @20% off + $20 signup
need online *ssignment help? get help with *ssignments @20% off by 1500+ *ssignment helpers in usa at *ssignmenthelp.us. 24 x 7 help. order now!

Semrush Rank: 1,317,905 Facebook ♡: 16 Website Worth: $ 1,500
Is it similar? Yes No
copycrafter.net copycrafter.net
assignment help online | hire your homework *ssignment helper
it is possible to get qualified online *ssignment help! how? copycrafter.net hires only experts, provides✍ 100% original papers, and delivers them on time.

Semrush Rank: 2,003,987 Website Worth: $ 900
Is it similar? Yes No
computerscienceassignmentshelp.xyz computerscienceassignmentshelp.xyz
computer science *ssignment help – computer science project and homework help
we are no. 1 in online help for computer science *ssignments and cs programming projects and homework.

Semrush Rank: 20,086,827 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

thanksforthehelp.com thanksforthehelp.com
tfth – the help platform
thanks for the help (tfth) is the help platform for college students helping them at every step of their education starting from finding the right scholarship to helping them decide the right career path to helping them ace their courses by helping them in their *ssignments.

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 1,500
Is it similar? Yes No
mcessay.com mcessay.com
essay writing service mcessay – get writing help online
trustworthy custom paper writing service provides writing help with the best conditions. our writers create great papers for cheap! try our service and get an a+ essay!

Semrush Rank: 1,395,503 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 1,100
Is it similar? Yes No
domyhomework.guru domyhomework.guru
do my homework for me | quality help from top writers
wondering “who can help to do my homework on time?” use our professional online writing service to get excellent grades and complete all the homework *ssignments like a nerd: top quality, 100% anonymity, low prices are guaranteed!

Semrush Rank: 977,961 Facebook ♡: 4 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
gishomework.com gishomework.com
homepage | gis homework help
instant gis and remote sensing homework help. stuck with your homework? gis homework help. gis *ssignment help. surveying *ssignment help. we are the best.

Semrush Rank: 8,986,695 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

domyhomework.co domyhomework.co
do my homework – find experts online right now | domyhomework.co
do my homework is most trusted online tutoring platform for students. we can help you with any *ssignment or any homework problem or any subject. improve your grades and get step-by-step written *ssistance depending on your study needs.

Semrush Rank: 2,504,860 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No
eduhomeworkhelp.com eduhomeworkhelp.com
homework help services usa, *ssignment help services usa
we help you with online homework help services and *ssignment help services in usa. we offer english homework help, accounting homework help, finance homework help etc

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 700
Is it similar? Yes No
domyassignments.com domyassignments.com
write my *ssignment online: can you do my homework and help me 24/7? – domyassignments.com
if you ask, “can someone write my *ssignment for me?” ⍟ we are ready to do your homework at the best possible level of academic performance. ✪ just contact us to get 100% original, confidential and top-quality services

Semrush Rank: 409,197 Facebook ♡: 18 Website Worth: $ 3,100
Is it similar? Yes No
homeworkholics.com homeworkholics.com
pay for cheap homework help under $10 | homeworkholics
we provide cheap homework help online for college and university students. try us today!

Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
assigncode.com assigncode.com
do my homework for me: 100% excellence in every technical *ssignment | *ssigncode.com
write “do my homework for me” and the team of experienced academic helpers will meet all your requirements. get superior-quality *ssistance at an affordable price. share your instructions for our specialists to compose a great paper.

Semrush Rank: 883,133 Website Worth: $ 1,200
Is it similar? Yes No
college-homework-help.org college-homework-help.org
college homework help online is fast and reliable academic service!
discreet college homework help is now available online. professional academic *ssignment writing, editing, and proofreading. we provide premium academic *ssistance on a huge variety of subjects.

Semrush Rank: 151,208 Facebook ♡: 38 Website Worth: $ 1,000
Is it similar? Yes No

apexessays.com apexessays.com
write my essay service – all types essay help starting $8
write my essay service – all types essay help starting $8

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 2,200
Is it similar? Yes No

mycomputersciencehomework.com mycomputersciencehomework.com

Semrush Rank: 5,543,520 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
migrantmoth.com migrantmoth.com
the best place for free homework, *ssignment and project writing help
still struggling with your homework *ssignment? can’t afford professional paid writing *ssistance? we will help you with your complex project for free.

Semrush Rank: 8,789,879 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
dyenamicmovement.com dyenamicmovement.com
dye-namic movement products
dye-namic movement products

Semrush Rank: 2,589,783 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
dreamassignment.com dreamassignment.com

Moz DA: 18 Moz Rank: 3 Semrush Rank: 553,681 Facebook ♡: 515 Website Worth: $ 5,600
Is it similar? Yes No
assignmenthelps.co.uk assignmenthelps.co.uk
assignment help uk | online *ssignment writing services @ cheap price
online *ssignment help by professional expert writers top grades. *ssignment helps uk offers quality *ssignment writing services to student @ 50% off.

Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
homeworkhelps.net homeworkhelps.net
assignment help online | homework help | help with *ssignment
homeworkhelps.net provides online *ssignment help, dissertation help, homework help with 100% satisfaction for uk, usa, australia, canada, nz students

Semrush Rank: 2,520,643 Facebook ♡: 21 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
assignmentshark.com assignmentshark.com
assignment help online – any help with your homework *ssignments
receive *ssignment help online from professional experts. it will suit all students with different homework problems!

Semrush Rank: 2,768,598 Website Worth: $ 500
Is it similar? Yes No

essayhawks.com essayhawks.com
cheap essay writing service | buy cheap essays starting $9/page
cheap essay writing service for students looking for cheap essay writers to write essays with no plagiarism? buy essay from us today at cheap price!

Semrush Rank: 8,974,762 Facebook ♡: 1,608 Website Worth: $ 600
Is it similar? Yes No
ridemyhomework.com ridemyhomework.com
expert writing and homework services | %100 plagiarism free | ride my homework
expert writing and homework services | %100 plagiarism free | ride my homework

Semrush Rank: 432,083 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

homeworkdoer.org homeworkdoer.org
do my homework for money – homework answers
a single grade can ruin your goals. we are to make sure that does not happen. check our…

Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
homework-writer.com homework-writer.com
all-in-one do my homework *ssignment for me writing service. order much needed timely writer’s help
pay someone to do my homework *ssignment online! order a much needed writing service to work on one of your *ssignments. make your dreams become a reality and save time with our professional academic help.

Semrush Rank: 350,638 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
doahomework.com doahomework.com
do my homework for me 24/7 | 3 hours deadline‎| (5% off)
get your homework done cheap by a vetted academic writer. on-time delivery. personal approach. 100% quality *ssurance. flexible prices from $10/page.

Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
ibuyessayonline.com ibuyessayonline.com
buy essay online | purchase essays from experts
are you tired of writing endless essays that are boring and cannot make you feel any happier? there is a solution to your problem: you can now buy essay online from the most reliable company on the market. place an order today to receive an excellent essay for high school or college and be the best in class.

Semrush Rank: 5,114,076 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No
homeworkmarket.me homeworkmarket.me
homework market: your real homework help website only from $8.99
? real homework help here!!!! ? custom homework from $8.99 ✔ more than 3000 orders from 2010 year ✔ zero plagiarism ✔ complete confidentiality ✔ affordable pricing ✔ free revisions ✔turnaround from 3 hours ✔ any citation style ✔ fast delivery ✔ native writers. get your homework written in time, and guaranteed excellent grades with the lowest price.

Semrush Rank: 2,670,898 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

domyassignmentforme.com domyassignmentforme.com

Semrush Rank: 10,256,251 Facebook ♡: 4 Website Worth: $ 1,300
Is it similar? Yes No
homeworkhelpdesk.org homeworkhelpdesk.org

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No
nursinghomeworkhelp.com nursinghomeworkhelp.com
nursing homework help – nursing homework help
nursing homework help – nursing homework help

Semrush Rank: 9,658,927 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
myhomeworkhelponline.com myhomeworkhelponline.com
my homework help online – online *ssignment writing solution
my homework help online provides homework help, *ssignment writing solution for the students by our professors & technical experts at best prices.

Semrush Rank: 4,381,581 Facebook ♡: 142 Website Worth: $ 800
Is it similar? Yes No
help-with-homework.com help-with-homework.com
online homework helper | help with homework
online homework helper | help with homework

Semrush Rank: 8,076,584 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

gethomeworkonline.com gethomeworkonline.com

Semrush Rank: 17,501,141 Website Worth: $ 1,200
Is it similar? Yes No
csprojecthelp.xyz csprojecthelp.xyz

Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No

24x7assignmenthelp.com 24x7assignmenthelp.com
50% off on online *ssignment solution – 24×7 *ssignment help
do you have trouble with your *ssignment? don’t worry, 24×7 *ssignment help online available here to help you. we provide online *ssignment solutions to students.

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 1,100
Is it similar? Yes No
nursingassignments.org nursingassignments.org

Semrush Rank: 9,970,648 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
northbendlibrary.com northbendlibrary.com
free homework and *ssignment help for college students
we help students get unstuck with their homework projects and college *ssignments. our academic writers offer top notch *ssistance for free.

Semrush Rank: 3,380,037 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
getassignmenthelponline.com getassignmenthelponline.com

Semrush Rank: 8,027,230 Facebook ♡: 430 Website Worth: $ 500
Is it similar? Yes No
essayhave.com essayhave.com
essayhave.com® – official website
our custom writing service has been on the market for 8 years. we continue getting positive reviews from the customers satisfied with the high quality of the papers we deliver.

Semrush Rank: 450,077 Website Worth: $ 600
Is it similar? Yes No
doanassignment.com doanassignment.com
do my *ssignment for me | *ssignment service (24 x 7)
400+ online writing experts help in different subject areas. rated 9,8/10. message us now. instant response. get help for your *ssignments in under 3 hrs.

Semrush Rank: 1,377,153 Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
helpinhomework.org helpinhomework.org
best homework help | write my *ssignment – help in homework
looking for homework help? help in homework *ssists students to get personalized help with homework. we will write your *ssignment for a+ grades. visit now!

Semrush Rank: 424,716 Facebook ♡: 487 Website Worth: $ 3,700
Is it similar? Yes No

123writings.com 123writings.com
custom writing service | original college essays & research papers
custom writing service | original college essays & research papers

Semrush Rank: 2,464,914 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No

poshpooch.ca poshpooch.ca
posh pooch hotel & daycare – dog boarding & daycare services
the posh pooch hotel & daycare is edmonton’s premier boarding and daycare hotel exclusively for dogs!

Semrush Rank: 7,188,649 Facebook ♡: 735 Website Worth: $ 1,400
Is it similar? Yes No
courseexperts.com courseexperts.com
course experts – accounting *ssignment help,finance *ssignment help,marketing *ssignment help,law *ssignment help,nursing *ssignment help,management *ssignment help,english *ssignment help,history *ssignment help.
finance *ssignment help,accounting *ssignment help,marketing *ssignment help,law *ssignment help,nursing *ssignment help,management *ssignment help,english *ssignment help,history *ssignment help.

Semrush Rank: 34,613,907 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
askassignmenthelp.com askassignmenthelp.com
online *ssignment help urgent *ssignment help by experts
looking for urgent *ssignment help? connect with ask *ssignment help experts now to get high quality online *ssignment help solutions by professional experts

Moz DA: 19 Moz Rank: 2.9 Semrush Rank: 954,154 Facebook ♡: 57 Website Worth: $ 1,700
Is it similar? Yes No
acemyhomeworkwriters.com acemyhomeworkwriters.com
acemyhomework | cheapest homework help online
acemyhomework is the best homework help website for students. acemyhomework writers offer top *ssignment writing service, essay writing help, dissertation writing help & homework help to students at affordable prices. order now!

Semrush Rank: 7,568,439 Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
gradecrest.com gradecrest.com
custom essay writing service | essay typing website | write my essays
we are the best cheap custom essay writing service online. let us handle all your *ssignments, essays, and homework. order now!

Semrush Rank: 611,053 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 400
Is it similar? Yes No
paymetodoyourhomework.com paymetodoyourhomework.com

Moz DA: 31 Moz Rank: 3.4 Semrush Rank: 407,246 Facebook ♡: 160 Website Worth: $ 2,700
Is it similar? Yes No
seedsymposium.com seedsymposium.com
homework writing tutorials to boost your grades
learn how to write any homework *ssignment in a matter of hours. free writing tips and guidelines from experienced writers and editors.

Semrush Rank: 8,730,159 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
domyhomework.net domyhomework.net
do my homework for me – instant academic help online in canada
our professional *ssignment service based in canada can cope with any do my homework requests and perform it at the highest level possible.

Semrush Rank: 8,897,837 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
assignments4u.com assignments4u.com
online *ssignment help | best *ssignment help | tutors
assignment help & homework help *ssistance by expert tutors. fast & cheap *ssignment answers & solutions for students across usa, new zealand, australia.

Facebook ♡: 461 Website Worth: $ 1,400
Is it similar? Yes No
a2zassignment.com a2zassignment.com

Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
bighomework.com bighomework.com
do my *ssignment for me | yes, we can do homework for you | bighomework
can anyone do my *ssignment for me in usa? yes, we at bighomework.com help you to do your homework on accounting, economics, mba, finance, english, and statistics. call us!!

Semrush Rank: 25,808,760 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No
abassignmenthelp.com abassignmenthelp.com
assignment help uk: high quality *ssignment writing @ 20% off
abassignmenthelp offers *ssignment help service in uk with on time delivery. get online *ssignment help by expert writers to secure good grades. order now

Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
yourhomeworkhelp.org yourhomeworkhelp.org
online homework service | your homework help
your homework help provides qualified homework services 247. check out the range of our services and order the homework you need

Semrush Rank: 4,274,459 Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 400
Is it similar? Yes No
bestessayservicesreview.com bestessayservicesreview.com
best essay writing service reviews for us students [2021 update]
read the best essay writing service reviews and find your best essay service easily! you will get all the possible discounts and quality work from top-rated companies!

Semrush Rank: 4,458,600 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
greatassignmenthelp.com greatassignmenthelp.com
stackpath
stackpath

Moz DA: 42 Moz Rank: 4.7 Semrush Rank: 369,402 Facebook ♡: 352 Website Worth: $ 7,700
Is it similar? Yes No
eduworldusa.com eduworldusa.com
north america’s most reliable “do my homework” provider – eduworldusa
still searching for a trusted provider to help you with “do my homework” requests? eduworldusa is north america most affordable and reliable homework help provider

Semrush Rank: 33,790,708 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
courseworktutors.com courseworktutors.com
coursework tutors | get *ssignment, dissertation, homework help online
get homework help, *ssignment help, dissertation writing service online us, uk & australia. ask coursework tutors for subjects like math, science & finance.

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 300
Is it similar? Yes No
assignmentpedia.com assignmentpedia.com
assignment help, online homework help, college homework help, online tutoring
assignment help, online homework help, college homework help, online tutoring

Semrush Rank: 4,766,903 Facebook ♡: 11 Website Worth: $ 1,100
Is it similar? Yes No
urgenthomework.com urgenthomework.com
homework help | get a+ grade in homework | *ssignment help online
urgenthomework provides online homework help, *ssignment help for students in accounting, maths, science, finance, economics and statistics homework help 24/7.

Semrush Rank: 667,999 Facebook ♡: 90 Website Worth: $ 4,600
Is it similar? Yes No
makemepass.org makemepass.org
welcome – make me pass
welcome – make me pass

Semrush Rank: 8,898,397 Facebook ♡: 70 Website Worth: $ 100
Is it similar? Yes No
allassignmentexperts.com allassignmentexperts.com
assignment help | homework help
get the best *ssignment help and homework help online from qualified experts at affordable prices. quality solution, delivery before deadline and faster response to revisions makes us a reliable and trusted company.

Semrush Rank: 1,026,768 Facebook ♡: 31 Website Worth: $ 2,000
Is it similar? Yes No
paysomeonetodo.com paysomeonetodo.com
no need to study: pay someone to do your class, homework, tests, exams and boost your grades!
paysomeonetodo is the leader in academic help services for college students and busy professionals. hiring someone to do your test exam homework or even your full cl*ss is as easy as contacting us on live chat or filling a request form.

Semrush Rank: 1,498,721 Facebook ♡: 7 Website Worth: $ 200
Is it similar? Yes No
tutorshelponline.com tutorshelponline.com
get tutors help online who made custom *ssignment for you
tutors help online is not only a brand, it’s a place of professional writer who offer you custom *ssignment help online and cheap homework writing services.

Semrush Rank: 37,996,842 Facebook ♡: 55 Website Worth: $ 300
Is it similar? Yes No
theuniversitypapers.com theuniversitypapers.com
tup tutors – tup tutors
tup tutors – tup tutors

Semrush Rank: 6,754,376 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
myadmissionsessay.com myadmissionsessay.com
professional essay writing and editing service | plagiarism free papers | my admission essays
professional essay writing and editing service | plagiarism free papers | my admission essays

Facebook ♡: 0 Website Worth: $ 3,800
Is it similar? Yes No
essaytank.com essaytank.com
Legit Essay Writing Service from $9 a page- EssayTank.com
Get Legit Essay Writing Services from $9 a page. EssayTank offers high quality essays at low prices! Free plagiarism reports! 24/7 Customer support!! Order now!

Semrush Rank: 5,004,385 Website Worth: $ 0
Is it similar? Yes No
Latest 5
Top 5
Most 5

Suggest Site to this list (123homework.com)
Site Url
example.com
Why do you think it is similar?
explain please why it is similar
Email address
Enter email
We’ll never share your email with anyone else. You’ll get a confirmation email.
4 (times) 5

What is sitelike.org?
sitelike.org is a free tool to search and find Similar Websites, alternatives or related to the given site.
It helps you to find similar sites based on keyword overlap and shared audience.
“Similar sites like” first finds the best and top keywords for all websites and rank them.

Some random sites
become.dk dudhwa-national-park.com
hardygroupintl.com hemisphere-sud.com
HomeTop Sites
Most VisitedLatestContactPolicyAdd Site
Remove

MIS602 Data Modelling & Database Design

ASSESSMENT
Subject Code and Title BRIEF
MIS602 Data Modelling & Database Design
Assessment
Reflective Research Report
Individual/Group
Individual
Length
Three Thousand Word Limit
Learning Outcomes
a, b, c, d
Submission Friday 11:59 PM AEST/AEDT of Module 6.1 (week 11)
Weighting
40%
Total Marks
40 Marks
Context:
The MIS602 Data Modelling & Database Design subject is designed for you to progressively add to your understanding of data and database management and its relevance with in business context. It also introduces you to some of the key features of database management system and designing database systems that will feature in later modules of this topic. In order for you to do well in this subject, it is imperative that you undertake all of the learning activities in the modules. The learning activities are presented as a way of scaffolding your learning so that you can attempt the building blocks of the assessments and be in a safe environment to fail and to learn from them. Therefore, doing your learning activities and seeking feedback from them from peers and from the learning facilitator is the single best way of preparing for doing well in this assessment.
Scenario:
The scenario for this assessment is a multi-specialty hospital system, the Royal Rundle Hospital (RRH), that provides a broad range of services to the community which include surgical, maternity, obstetric care, dialysis, emergency, mental health, aged and palliative care, allied health services and a 24-hour emergency department. The RRH has been serving in the region for over 50 years and has been using paper-based forms and documents to store and manage all the data with some use of spreadsheets that started not so long ago. Now that the management of RRH wants to take the advantages of Information Technology to maintain and manage the records of the various aspects of the hospital system more efficiently, they have put out a Request for Proposals (RFP) for appropriately qualified consultants to undertake a body of work that would help to scope the data requirements for such a system. With your success in your Torrens University Australia degree so far, and other similar projects that have garnered you some sustained success in the eyes of the profession and community, you have been shortlisted among no less than 10 other consultancies. There are expectations from them, then, as to the standard of report you will produce.
The management of the RRH has provided you with an overview and description of the hospital system as below-
Overview:
The Royal Rundle Hospital (RRH) is a multi-specialty hospital that includes a number of departments, rooms, doctors, nurses, compounders, and other staff working in the hospital. Patients having different kinds of ailments come to the hospital and get checkup done from the relevant doctors. If required they are admitted in the hospital and discharged after treatment. The hospital maintains the records of various departments, rooms, and doctors in the hospital besides the most important records of the regular patients, patients admitted in the hospital, the checkup of patients done by the doctors, the patients that have been operated, and patients discharged from the hospital.
Description:
In RRH, there are many departments like Orthopedic, Pathology, Emergency, Dental, Gynecology, Anesthetics, I.C.U., Blood Bank, Operation Theater, Laboratory, M.R.I., Neurology, Cardiology, Cancer Department, Corpse, etc. There is an OPD where patients come and get a card (that is, entry card of the patient) for check up from the relevant doctor. After making entry in the card, they go to the relevant doctor’s room and the doctor checks up their ailments. According to the ailments, the doctor either prescribes medicine or admits the patient in the relevant department. The patient may choose either private or general room according to his/her need. But before getting admission in the hospital, the patient has to fulfill certain formalities of the hospital like room charges, etc. After the treatment is completed, the doctor discharges the patient. Before discharging from the hospital, the patient again has to complete certain formalities of the hospital like balance charges, test charges, operation charges (if any), blood charges, doctors’ charges, etc.
Next, the management talks about the doctors of the hospital. There are two types of the doctors in the hospital, namely, regular doctors and call-on doctors. Regular doctors are those doctors who come to the hospital daily. Call-on doctors are those doctors who are called by the hospital if the relevant regular doctor is not available.
Instructions:
The management believes and understands that the benefits of an IT solution to manage and maintain their records are enormous and hopes to gain a thorough insight that should come from a lot of forethought and design elements fed into it before it could be seriously considered by them.
The RRH management seeks consultation on what the data requirements of such a system might be.
There are two objectives of this assessment:
1. For the purposes of the client, the Royal Rundle Hospital (RRH) management, you are to produce a design brief and,
2. For the purposes of the assessment, you are to produce a reflection.
So, this written submission should expertly mix a consultative style—that is, providing a solution to the problem as outlined by the client—with a deep reflection on what you have learned in the subject and the potential for such an automated system. You will need to use your judgement on this, it is likely to take several drafts to get it right. The deliverable for this assessment is plainly:
You are required to create a consultative report that addresses the data requirements of the proposed Royal Rundle Hospital (RRH) System as well as commenting on the feasibility of such a solution, given what you learned in the subject. Following instructions will assist you in completion of the task.
Some hints for you to heed while you develop and write your assessment:
• Consider all aspects of the hospital’s operations and flows of data and then explore the benefits and challenges that an automated system may present in regard to effectiveness, efficiency an also adaptation issues, when implemented.
• The RRH management has not provided any assumptions and you should list these if
your proposal and reflection are to be considered cogent.
Based on your learning from the course modules and previous assignments, you are expected to come up with data requirements and a logical design of the system and a brief commentary on the design.
Submission Instructions:
This consultative research and reflective report will be in a format that you choose and there are no prescriptions for what to include or what not to include. You will need to research consultant-grade reports (look for consulting reports form the Big Four firms as a guide and use them as the basis for their content, articulation presentation standard).
Besides your research and reflection, you should include logical data requirements in a design summary that includes appropriate Entity- Relationship (ER) Diagram replete with connectivity and cardinality considerations, and the database schema with the final set of Relations normalised to 3NF (Note: you do not need to include the normalisation steps). You should list any and all assumptions used in your report as well as any limitations that the reader should consider as they read your report.
You should treat the prescribed word limit as something you cannot breach as there is no plus-or- minus 10 per cent ascribed in this assessment. The reality of consultant-grade reports is that any that breach the requirements are rejected and no reasoning is provided to the consultant. As you are preparing for your professional life, treat this requirement as the same in this subject and that any report that breaches the word limit will not be marked.
Requests for extensions must be compliant with the university policy and must be applied for before the due date. Include in your application a full draft of your assessment as this draft may be what is assessed if the extension request is denied.
Submit your report to the submission point in Blackboard prior to the due date. In accordance with university policy, late assessments will attract a 10% of available grade penalty for every day late, up to a maximum of 5 days, after which the assessment will not be marked.
Please note that requests for resubmissions of this assessment will not be considered.

Learning Rubric: Assessment Three
Assessment
Attributes
Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Understanding of the
Data requirements
30% Demonstrates limited understanding of the data requirements Fair understanding of the data requirements. May neglect to provide resources or that these are cursorily provided without reference to specific areas in the source. Good understanding of the data requirements demonstrated. May provide a limited number of sources the peer can use to develop their technique from. Very good understanding of the data requirements demonstrated. Makes recommendations to other external sources the peer can access to develop their understanding. Outstanding understanding of the data requirements demonstrated through recommendation of other sources with specific references to components of it that the peer will benefit from.
Capture of key entities and their relationships
40% Less than 50% entities and relationships are completed 50-64% entities and relationships completed 65-74% entities and relationships completed 75-84% entities and relationships completed 85-100% entities and relationships completed
Effective
communication
30% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity.
MIS602 Assign 3 Page 4 of 4

MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems Assessment Reflective Report

ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and Title MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems
Assessment Reflective Report
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1500 words (+/- 10%
Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
d) Effectively communicate and demonstrate understanding of the importance of ethical and professional standards in own career and professional future.
Submission Due by 11:55 PM AEST Friday of Module 6.1 (Week 11)
Intensive class: 11:55 PM AEST Friday of Module 6.1 (Week 6)
Weighting 35%
Total Marks 35 marks
Task Summary
This assessment task requires you to reflect on your experiences in MIS500 this trimester by following a four-step process to gain insights into the work you have done and how it relates to your own career and life more broadly. In doing so, you will need to produce a weekly journal to record your learning and then as the trimester comes to a close reflect on these experiences and submit a final reflection of 1500 words (+/- 10%) that will include the weekly journal as an appendices.
Context
This is an individual assignment that tracks your growth as a student of Information Systems over the trimester. It is scaffolded around your weekly learning activities. Completing the activities and seeking input from your peers and the learning facilitator is essential for you to achieve a positive result in this subject. Before you start this assessment, be sure that you have completed the learning activities in all of the modules. This reflective report gives you the opportunity to communicate your understanding of how information systems relate to your career and future.
Task Instructions
1. During Module 1 – 5, you were ask to produce a weekly journal to record your learnings each week. Based on these weekly journals, please write a 1500 word reflective report about your experience.
2. You are required to follow the four steps of Kolb’s learning cycle when writing the reflective report.
You will keep a learning journal throughout the trimester. Each week as you complete the learning activities you record your experience in spreadsheet or word document.
A suggested format for the learning journal is as follows:
Date Learning Activity Impact (what it means to you) Evidence (attach record of activity). This might be a set of slides, word document or pictures of work you
have completed in class
For each day in your learning journey, write the date and then the learning activity you engaged in. Detail what impact the learning had on you and then include any evidence you might like to keep for use later on. This journal should be appended to this assessment when you submit it.
(source: Kolb DA 1984, Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development, Prentice Hall,
New Jersey.)
Step 1
Concrete experience – Keep a learning journal
The first step is to keep a learning journal for the trimester (Modules 1.1 through to 5.2 as described above. You should have already completed this step by now.
Step 2
Reflective observation – Summarise what happened
You should now be able to comment on your experiences this trimester. This exercise is not a list of what you have done but rather an observation of what you have learned – were there any themes that arose from your journal? The point of a learning journal is to start a discussion on what the key concepts and skills you have learned and acquired during the course of this subject. This is because we often don’t stop to think and reflect on what we have learned
Step 3
Abstract conceptualization – Analyse what this means
The next step is to analyse what you have found. Reflective practice is a process of thinking about new experiences with a view of learning. It is a form of personal response to new experiences, situations, events or information. What new knowledge have you gained in response to this exercise? And what does this information mean? You are expected to reflect at a deep level here. This means that it is not just about explaining what you have done in this subject rather it requires you to think about your personal beliefs, your background and the way you perceive the world around you. Did you learn anything in this subject that challenged you or change the way you thought about information systems or business?
Step 4
Active experimentation – New action
The final step is to discuss what you plan to do with this new knowledge. These new insights may lead to a change of thinking or behaviour. In what ways? Set yourself some specific goals for your future studies or career.
1. You are required to write this assessment in a report format using the following headings:
2. Introduction
3. Reflective Observation
4. Abstract conceptualization
5. Active experimentation
6. Conclusion
7. Appendix of learning journal (with evidence)
Please note that simply describing what you have done each week will not be sufficient to pass this assessment. You are expected to go ‘deeper’ and analyse what this subject meant to you and your future.
Referencing
Formal citation of sources is not required. However, specific reference to your own experiences must be made. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research if you do make reference other work. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Please refer to the marking rubric to ensure you address all the assessment criteria.
Submission Instructions
Please submit ONE MSWord document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment 3 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity Declaration
I declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms
I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Demonstrated understanding of the
learning cycle/reflection
model
Percentage for this criterion = 10%
No clear understanding of Kolb’s learning cycle. Has not clearly demonstrated an understanding of Kolb’s learning cycle. The four stages are not articulated and appropriate to the discussion. Demonstrated understanding of Kolb’s learning cycle. The four stages are clearly articulated and somewhat add to the discussion. Demonstrated understanding of Kolb’s learning cycle. The four stages are clearly articulated and appropriate to the discussion. Demonstrated understanding of Kolb’s learning cycle. The four stages are clearly articulated to a high level and appropriate to the discussion.
Reflection and analysis of own experiences demonstrating independent thinking and expressing meaningful insights.
Percentage for this
criterion = 25%
The learning journey has been cursorily put together and needs significant work in demonstrating how the subject has developed the student.
The learning journey has a passable level of detail; more work is needed to demonstrate how the subject has changed the student as a result of undergoing it.
An inadequate, unclear, unfocussed or overview which does not include analysis or personalization or express meaningful insights The learning journey shows an average level of depth; there may not be any vulnerability or detail in how they have changed as a result of undergoing the subject
The learning journey has a good level of depth and the student has shown a hint of vulnerability as well as good detail in how they have grown as a person and as a professional.
Reflection and analysis of own experiences is personalized, and to a certain extent
demonstrates independent thinking and expresses
insights
The learning journey is chronicled to an appropriate depth and the student has shown vulnerability as well as significant detail in growing as a person as a professional.
Reflection and analysis of own experiences is consistently personalized, demonstrates independent thinking and expresses meaningful insights
Evidence of changed thinking and/or goal The learning journey has been cursorily put The scope of the report needs significant The scope of the learning journey may need to be The learning journey has a scope that is good and The learning journey narrative has been
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
setting due to new understanding of behaviour
Percentage for this
criterion = 20%
together and needs significant work in scoping and recounting how the student has developed.
Goal setting was not attempted.
adjustment and the student needs further work in demonstrating how they have changed as a result of undergoing the subject.
Little attempt was made to set goals based on the knowledge attained from reflection. adjusted or the account provided may need more imagination as to how the subject developed the student.
Goals were set for the future includes a very good account of how the student changed as a person and as a professional.
Based on this reflection measureable goals were set for the future. scoped well and includes a complete account of how the student changed, both as a person and a professional.
Based on this reflection measureable goals were set for the future.
Journal appendix
Percentage for this criterion = 30%
It may be obvious that the student has not completed self-directed study or completed the learning activities. Significant more work is needed to demonstrate the work the student did in the subject.
Little or no evidence is presented.
The student can be seen to have made an attempt to refer to work they have done in their study of the subject to illustrate their
journey
Module 1.1 – 5.2 documented with some missing. Evidence is not well presented.
The assessment includes a good number of references to previous work completed in the subject to illustrate their journey.
Module 1.1 – 5.2 present (although some may be missing) and well documented. Evidence is robust and well presented with some gaps.
The assessment includes a very good number and frequency of references to previously completed work, to illustrate their journey.
Module 1.1 – 5.2 present and well documented. Evidence is robust and well presented.
The assessment includes numerous references to the learning journal and learning activities throughout.
Module 1.1 – 5.2 present and well documented. Evidence is robust and well presented.
Assessment Attributes Fail
(Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75-84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Effective
Communication
(Written)
Percentage for this
criterion = 15%
Presents information.
Specialised language and terminology is rarely or inaccurately employed.
Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or the acknowledgment of sources.
Communicates in a readable manner that largely adheres to the given format.
Generally employs specialised language & terminology with accuracy.
Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.
Communicates in a coherent and readable manner that adheres to the given format.
Accurately employs specialised language and
terminology.
Meaning is easy to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical.
Occasional minor errors
present in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.
Communicates coherently and concisely in a manner that adheres to the given format.
Accurately employs a wide range of specialised
language and terminology.
Engages audience interest.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is, clear and persuasive.
Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.
Communicates eloquently. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely and creatively within the given format.
Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology.
Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments and evidence are insightful, persuasive and expertly presented.
Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.

BUSN112: Managing Markets

ASSESSMENT GUIDE
BUSN112: Managing Markets, Semester 2 2020
Assessment 3
Individual Market Analysis Business Report
Weighting [40%] Why this assessment?
This assessment provides you with the opportunity to appraise a data set using learnt descriptive statistical skills in order to demonstrate basic applied understanding of such skills in a marketing context. This assessment will also enable you to demonstrate the ability to interpret numeric data, and derive market or consumer meaning from it.
What are the types of employability skills that I will acquire upon completion of this assessment?
Skill Type
Developed critical and analytical thinking ? Developed ability to solve complex problems ?
Developed confidence to learn independently ? Developed written communication skills ? Developed knowledge in the field of marketing ? Developed work-related knowledge and skills ?
Developed effective research skills ?
Assessment Overview:
Due date: 10 November 2020, 8am
The submission system/Turnitin opens on 3 Nov, 8am. Please access the Turnitin box through a LEO site named -EXAM-BUSN112-National-Semester 2, 2020- on the left side of your LEO page and click on the main exam tile.
Main exam tile will be accessible from 19 Oct.
Weighting: 40%
Length and/or format: 2250-word report
Learning outcomes assessed LO3, LO4
Graduate attributes assessed GA5, GA8, GA9
How to submit: Turnitin created by the Examination Office (Access through a LEO site named -EXAM-BUSN112-NationalSemester 2, 2020 – on the left side of your LEO page and click on the main exam tile).
Main exam tile will be accessible from 19 Oct.
Return of assignment: Not returned
Assessment criteria: See the last page of this document
Context
In assessment 1, you were asked to introduce us to your gym and outline the legal and economic dimensions that were relevant. Then in assessment 2 you explored the key marketing considerations in the form of a persuasive presentation. Now, in your final piece, you will use collected data to justify your marketing strategy and present this in a formal business report.
Instructions
Prior to your assignment being drafted, you will be asked to participate in a class-wide anonymous survey, identifying your opinions about gyms. The results of this survey will be provided to you as a data set, which you can use for a statistical analysis to justify and support your marketing strategy identified in assessment 2.
In your report you will discuss the key identifiers from the dataset provided on LEO that you have chosen to support your marketing strategy. These should be supported by data and your knowledge of statistics. Identifiers may include gender, income, gym opinions, etc.
Consider the following questions:
1. What does the data tell you about the planned locality of your gym?
2. How does this support your strategy?
You may like to draw on additional sources to support these ideas. Be sure to indicate appropriate theories and their applications.
You should create tables and graphs to support your points, but these must be labelled and referenced clearly. Though you may find existing graphs and tables about your market, consider these as inspirational only and create your own using the data set you have been given.
Report writing is formal and intended for professional audiences. You will need to adapt the language you use to suit the audience.
Structure
Title Page Not included in word count
Executive Summary
(approximately 200 words) Not included in word count
Table of Contents Not included in word count
Introduction
(approximately 200 words) Clearly identify which key identifiers you have analysed in your report
Remind us of the key details about your gym
Main body (use subheadings here)
(approximately 1850 words) Discuss the key identifiers
Use headings for each section and sub section
Conclusion
(approximately 200 words)
References For students in the Peter Faber Business School, you are required to use the Harvard style of referencing. If you are in a different School, you are welcome to use the referencing style you have been taught; however, you must indicate this at the top of your reference list.
Appendices Not included in word count
Only use this if you need to provide additional information for reference
How do I submit?
• Electronic submission using LEO through Turnitin (Please access the Turnitin box through a LEO site named -EXAM-BUSN112-National-Semester 2, 2020” on the left side of your LEO page and click on the main exam tile.)
• Please include your student ID number and your name in the assignment file name.
• Submit one soft copy via LEO (link on unit site under Assessment). Please ensure you save a copy of your document before submitting it.
• Include the checklist below in your assessment document
• You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy.
• Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.
Checklist for students to submit along with their assignment
My submitted assignment assessment is within the specified word limit (+/-10%) ?
I have included references using the specified referencing style ?
I have correctly cited all my sources and references ?
I have formatted my assessment as per the specifications ?
I have checked my Turnitin assessment to ensure the similarity report is acceptable and explainable ?
I will be able to supply the process output, if required by my lecturer to prove this is my own work (e.g. screen dump of my search and retrieval of journal articles, etc.) ?
I have completed proof reading and checked for spelling and grammar ?
I have submitted my work before the due date/time ?
Some Helpful Websites and Resources
• How to use Excel’s Descriptive Statistics Tool
• How to run a t test two sample assuming unequal variances in Excel
• Mean, Median and Mode
• Measures of spread: range, variance & standard deviation
• Primary and Secondary Data
• Representing Data
• Skewness
• Standard Deviation – Explained and Visualized
• Types of Data
Other Resources on all of these topics can be found in the PowerPoint slides, textbook and workshop videos
Who can help me?
Academic skills Unit (ASU)
Studiosity
Post a question to the LEO discussion forum
Seek a consultation with one of the following lecturers:
• Dr. Andrew Papadimos (NLIC) – contact via LEO
• Laura Papadimos – contact via LEO
I’m having problems
SC: Application for Special Consideration Complete this form if you wish to be exempted from academic penalty because your study has been affected by unforeseen circumstances.
EX: Application for extension of time for submission of an Assessment Task Complete this form if you wish to apply for extension of time for submission of this Assessment Task.
Complete this form if you wish to apply for extension of time for submission of this Assessment Task.
Referencing
All referencing should be in ACU Harvard style; however if you are coming from another faculty, you may choose to use your usual referencing style. If this is the case you must indicate at the top of your reference list what referencing style you are using (e.g. APA, MLA, Chicago, etc).
Please ensure your assignment makes use of in-text citations and a reference list. Missing citations or references is equivalent to plagiarism.
Criteria
The full criteria are compiled in a rubric, which can be found on the following page/s.
Rubric for Assessment 3: Market Analysis Business Report – 40% Weighting
Learning Outcomes Criteria Standards
Below Expectations Meets expectations Exceeds Expectations
NN (0-49) PA (50-64) CR (65-74) DI (75-84) HD (85-100)
GA5
LO3
Weight: 20 marks
TL=4
Learning Stage I Different statistical techniques
understood and used to interpret the data for decision making No descriptive analysis is presented. No graphs to demonstrate descriptive
analysis are presented. No
required primary analysis is provided nor clearly demonstrated in tables. No statistical methods to test the hypothesis are correctly identified and used. Results are neither clearly labelled nor clearly presented in tables. No results of the primary analysis are correctly interpreted. No results of hypotheses testing are correctly interpreted. Based on the interpretation of results, no recommendations for the company are presented.
(0 to 9.9 marks)
Some descriptive analysis is presented. Some graphs to demonstrate descriptive analysis are presented. Some primary analysis is provided and clearly demonstrated in tables. Some statistical methods to test the hypothesis are correctly identified and used. Results are adequately labelled and clearly presented in tables. Some results of the primary analysis are correctly interpreted. Some results of hypotheses testing are correctly interpreted. Based on the interpretation of results, adequate recommendations for the company are presented.
(10 to 12.7 marks)
Credible descriptive analysis is presented. Some graphs to demonstrate descriptive analysis are presented. Credible primary analysis is provided and clearly demonstrated in tables. Some statistical methods to test the hypothesis are correctly identified and used. Results are credibly labelled and clearly presented in tables. Some results of the primary analysis are correctly interpreted. Some results of hypotheses testing are correctly interpreted. Based on the interpretation of results, credible recommendations for the company are presented.
(12.8 to 14.7 marks)
Distinctive descriptive analysis is presented. More than a few graphs to demonstrate descriptive analysis are presented. Distinctive primary analysis is provided and clearly demonstrated in tables. Several statistical methods to test the hypothesis are correctly identified and used. Results are distinctively labelled and clearly presented in tables. Most results of the primary analysis are correctly interpreted. Most results of hypotheses testing are correctly interpreted. Based on the interpretation of results, distinctive recommendations for the company are presented.
(14.8 to 16.8 marks)
Highly distinctive analysis is presented. All graphs to demonstrate descriptive analysis are presented. All required primary analysis is provided and clearly demonstrated in tables. All statistical methods to test the hypothesis are correctly identified and used. All results are clearly labelled and clearly presented in tables. All of the results of the primary analysis are correctly interpreted. All of the results of hypotheses testing are correctly interpreted. Based on the interpretation of results, highly distinctive recommendations for the company are presented.
(16.9 to 20 marks)
GA8
LO3
Weight: 4 marks TL=4
Learning Stage I and D Locating, organising , analysing and
synthesising relevant statistical
information and
data into business report Failure to locate, organise, analyse and synthesise relevant statistical
information and data into
business report .
(0 to 1.9 marks) Adequately located, organised, analysed and synthesised relevant statistical information and data into business report .
(2 to 2.5 marks) Credibly located, organised, analysed and synthesised relevant statistical information and data into business report .
(2.6 to 2.9 marks) Distinctively located, organised, analysed and synthesised relevant statistical information and data into business report .
(3 to 3.3 marks) Highly distinctively located, organised, analysed and synthesised relevant statistical information and data into business report .
(3.4 to 4 marks)
6
GA9
LO4
Weight: 16 marks
TL=3
Learning Stage I and D Communication
skills
(style, tone, technical writing
skills, referencing)
(6 marks)
Information presented is incoherent or in a style inappropriate to the task. Significant errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
Most or all sources have not been references using in-text citations and a reference list, or there are significant style issues.
(0 to 2.9 marks) Information presented is generally coherent and, in a style, appropriate to the task.
Grammar, punctuation and
spelling is generally correct, with some errors.
All sources are referenced using in-text citations and a reference list with some general errors in style.
(3.0 to 3.8 marks) Information presented in a coherent manner and in a style that is engaging and appropriate to the task. Little error in grammar, punctuation and spelling. All sources are referenced using in-text citations and a reference list with some errors in style.
(3.9 to 4.4 marks)
Information presented in a highly coherent manner and in a style that is engaging and appropriate to the task. There may be minor errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling.
All sources are referenced using in-text citations and a reference list with some minor errors in style.
(4.5 to 5 marks Information presented in a clear and extremely coherent manner, and in a style that is
engaging and highly appropriate to the task. No errors in grammar, punctuation and spelling. All sources are referenced using in-text citations and a reference list with no, or very minor errors in style.
(5.1 to 6 marks)
Notes: GA – Graduate Attribute; LO – Learning Outcome; TL – Taxonomy Level (or level of complexity) (see Bloom’s Taxonomy); Learning Stage – Introduced (I), Developed (D), Assured (A)

BLAW1002 SEMESTER 2 2020 – ASSESSMENT 3: LEGAL CASE STUDY

BLAW1002 SEMESTER 2 2020 – ASSESSMENT 3: LEGAL CASE STUDY – SHORT QUESTION AND ANSWER (40 MARKS)
For this assessment, students are to apply the concepts taught in the law modules for the unit (modules 9, 10 and 11) to a case study (Commonwealth Bank of Australia: The Unwitting Mule) and answer four short answer questions. To best answer these questions, students may be required to research beyond the principles taught in the lectures and tutorials, and will be required to reference any external material that is used to form the substance of their answers.
In breaking down the marks that are available for this assessment, each question is worth 9 marks for a total of 36 marks for the content portion of the assignment. The remaining 4 marks are awarded for the use of referencing and the structure / presentation of assignment submissions. Students are to integrate a completed cover page (a template is provided on blackboard) into their assignment document and submit their assignment file in soft copy format to a turnitin link in blackboard. A hard copy version of your assignment is not required to be submitted to your lecturer or tutor.
Assessment Questions
Read the Commonwealth Bank of Australia: The Unwitting Mule case study and answer the following questions:
1. What areas of law are pertinent to this case study? Describe what the identified areas of law cover, and explain how they are relevant to the issues raised in the case study. (9 marks)
2. What is the business structure of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)? What does this structure say of the duties that the bank’s directors owe to its stakeholders, and how have the directors breached those duties by allowing the conduct that is detailed in the case study. (9 marks)
3. Describe the regulatory responsibility of AUSTRAC in the context of this case. What changes (if any) to the scope of their responsibility were brought about by the findings of the 2018 Royal Commission into the Banking sector. (9 marks)
4. What business risks were ignored by the CBA executives, and what good governance and compliance practices could have been implemented to alleviate these risks? (9 marks)
Below is the marking rubric which will be used to grade your submission:
Question 1 – Relevant areas of law 0 – 2 marks
Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed.
Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 2 – 4 marks
Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail.
Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
4 – 5 marks
Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail.
Demonstrates a
reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 5 – 7 marks
Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail.
Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks
Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently
demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
/
9
Question 2 –
Business
Structure of
bank 0 – 2 marks
Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed.
Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply 2 – 4 marks
Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail.
Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in 4 – 5 marks
Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail.
Demonstrates a
reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply 5 – 7 marks
Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail.
Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks
Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently
demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
/
9
those concepts in answering the question. answering the question.
those concepts in answering the question.
Question 3 –
Regulatory responsibility of
AUSTRAC 0 – 2 marks
Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed.
Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 2 – 4 marks
Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail.
Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
4 – 5 marks
Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail.
Demonstrates a
reasonable conceptual understanding and a sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 5 – 7 marks
Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail.
Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. 7 – 9 marks
Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently
demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
/
9
Question 4 – Business risks,
Good Governance and Compliance 0 – 2 marks
Very limited knowledge of topic with significant gaps between what was covered and what answer should have addressed.
Answer shows no conceptual understanding, or 2 – 4 marks
Limited knowledge of topic and will not have discussed relevant points in much detail.
Answer shows a general lack of conceptual understanding, or ability to apply those concepts in 4 – 5 marks
Reasonable knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or what was discussed often lacks detail.
Demonstrates a
reasonable conceptual understanding and a 5 – 7 marks
Good knowledge of topic but may not have discussed all relevant points in answer, or will have discussed all relevant points but will occasionally lack detail.
Mostly demonstrates a high level conceptual understanding and a very good ability to apply those 7 – 9 marks
Comprehensive/detailed knowledge of topic with discussion of all relevant points in answer. Consistently
demonstrates an excellent conceptual understanding and an outstanding ability to apply those concepts in answering the question.
/
9
ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. answering the question.
sound ability to apply those concepts in answering the question. concepts in answering the question.
Referencing/Str ucture/ Presentation 0 marks
Cover page not included.
Incoherent writing style with structure not appropriate to short answer format. Recurrent grammar, formatting and spelling mistakes.
No in-text referencing or reference list provided. 1 mark
Cover page not included. Largely incoherent writing style with structure not appropriate to short answer format. Recurrent grammar, formatting and spelling mistakes. Either in-text referencing or reference list missing. 2 marks
Cover page may / may not have been included. Good writing style with structure appropriate to short answer format.
Inconsistent grammar, formatting and spelling applied. In-text referencing and reference list incomplete or contains errors. 3 marks
Cover page included. Very good writing style with structure largely appropriate to short answer format. Grammar, formatting and spelling mostly accurate. In-
text referencing and reference list provided that accords with Chicago referencing system. 4 marks
Cover page included. Fluent writing style with structure appropriate to short answer format. Grammar, formatting and spelling accurate
(little to no mistakes).
In-text referencing and reference list provided that accords with Chicago referencing system.
/
4
Referencing and appropriate acknowledgement of sources
Most often errors in referencing are incidental or clearly inadvertent. In the event of a level one incident of plagiarism occurring, a student may be contacted by the University and required to undertake further training or remedial work in relation to referencing. Where the lack of correct referencing appears to contravene the University policy on plagiarism, the student’s paper will be referred to the Unit Coordinator and dealt with according to University policy. This may amount to academic misconduct.
An important aspect of the University Plagiarism Policy is recognition that not all plagiarism incidents are intentional or involves cheating. If students are not learning as expected, they will be made aware of their difficulties and helped to improve. Those who deliberately choose to cheat by way of plagiarism, however, will be identified and dealt with accordingly.
Students are strongly advised to understand their responsibilities in relation to correct referencing and should consult the unit outline and the referencing information in the Learning Hub section of the Blackboard site.
Format of assignments
Assignments cannot be handwritten and must comply with the following format requirements. Those assignments, which do not conform to these requirements without prior agreement of the unit coordinator, will either be returned to the student unmarked or will have marks deducted:
Document type: Word or pdf (pdf preferred).
Font: Arial or similar font – no smaller than 12 point in size.
Pages: Numbered in top or bottom margin.
Spacing: Appropriate line spacing and paragraph spacing.
Margins: At least 2.5 cm top, left, right & bottom.
Labelling of assignment file: Should include student’s Curtin ID number, their first and last names, and the title of the assignment (BLAW1002 Assessment 3 – Legal Case Study).
Presentation
A well-presented assessment will consider and meet the following criteria:
• Cover sheet (located on Blackboard under the ‘Assessment’ tab) must be completed and integrated into your assignment document (The system will only allow you to submit one file so you won’t be able to submit your cover page and assignment document separately).
• Appropriate sentence structure.
• Correct grammar, spelling and punctuation.
• Paragraph size and breaks appropriate.
• Consistent format.
• Appropriate use of headings and sub-headings.
• Within acceptable word limit.
• Appropriate referencing and acknowledgment of sources.
Word Limit
The total assignment should be a minimum of 2,500 words and not exceed 3,000 words.
Please provide a word count on your cover sheet. A penalty of 10% will be imposed on assignments that exceed the word limit. Markers however, have the discretion as to whether to apply the penalty for an additional 100 words, provided the discussion remains relevant. The assignment will not be assessed if it exceeds 3,250 words and will result in a ZERO mark.
The word count does not include the following:
• cover sheet;
• in-text referencing;
• referencing list; and
• headings or sub-headings.
Submission of Assignment Document
Please read the submission process carefully. Students should understand that compliance with instructions in relation to an assessment task is critical. Students MUST be aware that non-compliance with submission instructions can result in a mark of ZERO.
All assignments must be submitted by Friday, 6 November 2020 by 1PM (WST), unless an extension for legitimate reasons has been granted by the unit cocoordinator prior to the deadline.
Students are required to submit their assignment to Blackboard through a link provided in the ‘Assessment’ folder titled ‘Assessment 3 – Legal Case Study’. Submission links will be set up for each mode / location in which this unit is being studied for the relevant study period (e.g. Bentley Internal, Fully Online, Miri etc.), so please ensure that you submit your assignment document to the correct link.
The assignment will automatically be submitted to the plagiarism detection program, Turnitin. Please ensure that the version of your assignment submitted to the system is the final version and not an incomplete draft, as the version of your assignment that is in the system at the time the deadline passes will be the version that is marked for assessment purposes (even if it was a draft version that was inadvertently submitted).
Feedback on Assignments
All of the teaching staff are available to assist you with your learning in this unit. You should contact your lecturer or tutor if you need help understanding the course material or issues arising in the assignment. There is also a staffed Ed forum available for students to ask questions of the teaching team. You can also contact the unit coordinator if you are still unable to get the answer you are seeking. Please allow 48 hours (two working days) for a response to your query.
Unfortunately, it is just not possible for the teaching staff to review draft assignments for comment before submission as it is in effect double marking that would give some students an unfair advantage over others. If you require help with your assignment, either narrow the question or section of work to specific questions such as “what is meant by this part of the question?” or “do the areas of law pertain to a particular part of the Module 9 lecture?” Questions such as “have I done this part right?” or “should I include a discussion about this regulator in question 4?” will not be answered as any answer provided by the lecturer or tutor would directly/indirectly impact the mark that the querying student would receive for the assessment, causing the unfairness referred to above.
This assignment will be marked using a rubric, which will be provided to students ahead of time. In addition to providing the set feedback to students that is contained in the rubric, markers will also offer individual comments on what a student had done well and what they could have done better to earn a higher mark.
Assessments submitted early will not be marked before the due date. Please refer to the unit outline for the full procedure in relation to penalties for late submission and requests for an extension.

Cognitive Theories of Learning

Cognitive Theories of Learning
Cognitive theory of learning adopts a perspective of assessing and modifying people’s beliefs to development, adaptation, and change. The cognitive theory attempts to assess and modifying cognitions as a means of changing how people think, belief and how they act to shape their future. Individual differences represent the dimensions in which people vary in society since the cultures are diverse and dynamic social systems. Cultural variations are differences in relative emphasis. The beliefs regulate human functioning through cognitive, motivational and decisional processes. They affect whether individuals think in self-enhancing or self-debilitating ways in how they motivate themselves in difficulties and the choices they make at important decision points in life (Bandura, 2002). The beliefs contribute significantly to the quality of human functioning. People’s shared beliefs influence the type of future that they seek to achieve by using their resources and efforts to meet forcible opposition and discouragements.
Some people live in individualistically oriented systems hence changing their cognitions is so difficult. Group pursuits are usually less demanding of personal efficacy than individual pursuits. People who work independently have less need to be oriented to other people’s beliefs hence they live in their own societies. Beliefs operate in complex ways regardless of how cultural pursuits are socially structured to achieve social change. Changing someone’s beliefs involves changing their habits and it involves first finding out what makes them strong by accessing their reasoning patterning to the belief (Bandura, 2002). To change someone’s belief, it is necessary to establish their point of view and connect their beliefs to the opinion that you need to change by showing them different conclusions and better facts.

Reference
Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied psychology, 51(2), 269-290. Retrieved from; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1464-0597.00092